HostIBGT vs SWBERA — price, size and safety, side by side
IBGT (Berachain) vs SWBERA (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
IBGT vs SWBERA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| IBGT | SWBERA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1871 | $0.2733 |
| Market cap | $567.09K | $11.38M |
| 24h volume | $90.50 DEX | $155.53K DEX |
| Liquidity | $38.00K | $24.04K |
| FDV | $567.09K | $11.34M |
| Holders | 25,840 | 13,011 |
| Age (days) | 588 | 442 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- SWBERA measures ~20× the market cap of IBGT
- IBGT measures ~1.6× the liquidity of SWBERA
- SWBERA measures ~1,719× the 24h volume of IBGT
- IBGT measures ~2.0× the holder count of SWBERA
What the data says
IBGT
The most important thing to know about IBGT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the market side, IBGT brings a $38.00K pool, 25,840 wallets holding and an established 588-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $567.09K in market cap, the $38.00K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 25,840-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created IBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
SWBERA
One detail on SWBERA didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, SWBERA shows $24.04K of on-chain liquidity, 13,011 wallets holding and an established record at 442 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $24.04K pool against roughly $11.38M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 13,011-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SWBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IBGT or SWBERA?
By tracked market cap: IBGT (Berachain) measures $567.09K and SWBERA (Berachain) measures $11.38M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IBGT or SWBERA?
On the contract checks we publish: IBGT (Berachain) grades C and SWBERA (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IBGT and SWBERA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show IBGT at −14.5% and SWBERA at −9.91%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.