HostIBERA vs POLLEN — price, size and safety, side by side
IBERA (Berachain) vs POLLEN (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
IBERA vs POLLEN — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| IBERA | POLLEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1959 | $0.0001645 |
| Market cap | $17.52M | $70.25K |
| 24h volume | $3.02K DEX | $25.72 DEX |
| Liquidity | $42.63K | $11.83K |
| FDV | $17.52M | $119.57K |
| Holders | 35,930 | 17,499 |
| Age (days) | 607 | 558 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- IBERA measures ~249× the market cap of POLLEN
- IBERA measures ~3.6× the liquidity of POLLEN
- IBERA measures ~117× the 24h volume of POLLEN
- IBERA measures ~2.1× the holder count of POLLEN
- over the shared window IBERA moved −11.4% while POLLEN moved −45.4%
What the data says
IBERA
There's a small gap on this page — IBERA's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, IBERA shows a $42.63K pool, a holder base of 35,930 and an established record at 607 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $42.63K of depth against a market cap of about $17.52M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IBERA reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. 35,930 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
POLLEN
The contract behind POLLEN is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason POLLEN's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, POLLEN carries $11.83K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 17,499 and an established 558-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $11.83K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $70.25K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 17,499 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created POLLEN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IBERA or POLLEN?
By tracked market cap: IBERA (Berachain) measures $17.52M and POLLEN (Berachain) measures $70.25K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IBERA or POLLEN?
On the contract checks we publish: IBERA (Berachain) grades B and POLLEN (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IBERA and POLLEN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show IBERA at −11.4% and POLLEN at −45.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.