HostIBERA vs IR — price, size and safety, side by side
IBERA (Berachain) vs IR (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
IBERA vs IR — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| IBERA | IR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1959 | $0.003779 |
| Market cap | $17.52M | $813.64K |
| 24h volume | $3.02K DEX | $478.62 DEX |
| Liquidity | $42.63K | $31.14K |
| FDV | $17.52M | $3.97M |
| Holders | 35,930 | 6,538 |
| Age (days) | 607 | 323 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- IBERA measures ~22× the market cap of IR
- IBERA measures ~6.3× the 24h volume of IR
- IBERA measures ~5.5× the holder count of IR
- over the shared window IBERA moved −11.4% while IR moved −5.24%
What the data says
IBERA
There's a small gap on this page — IBERA's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, IBERA shows a $42.63K pool, a holder base of 35,930 and an established record at 607 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $42.63K of depth against a market cap of about $17.52M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IBERA reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. 35,930 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
IR
The contract behind IR is about as reassuring as they come. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. That leaves IR at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On the market side, IR brings $31.14K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 6,538 and a maturing record at 323 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $31.14K of depth beside roughly $813.64K in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 6,538 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IBERA or IR?
By tracked market cap: IBERA (Berachain) measures $17.52M and IR (Berachain) measures $813.64K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IBERA or IR?
On the contract checks we publish: IBERA (Berachain) grades B and IR (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IBERA and IR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show IBERA at −11.4% and IR at −5.24%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.