HostHUMA vs GSTOCK — price, size and safety, side by side
HUMA (BNB Chain) vs GSTOCK (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
HUMA vs GSTOCK — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| HUMA | GSTOCK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02741 | $0.003423 |
| Market cap | $55.57M | $8.07M |
| 24h volume | $2.83M DEX | $2.34M DEX |
| Liquidity | $703.26K | $669.72K |
| FDV | $14.64M | $8.06M |
| Holders | 4,721 | 9,063 |
| Age (days) | 501 | 19 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- HUMA measures ~6.9× the market cap of GSTOCK
- GSTOCK measures ~1.9× the holder count of HUMA
- over the shared window HUMA moved −10.4% while GSTOCK moved −56.2%
What the data says
HUMA
There's a lot to like about how HUMA's contract is set up. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HUMA earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HUMA shows $703.26K of on-chain liquidity, 4,721 wallets holding and an established 501-day history as of 2026-10-09. Set the $703.26K of depth beside roughly $55.57M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 4,721 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
GSTOCK
GSTOCK is a four-day-old BNB Chain deployment at 0xcafdbce93477261db8250e42bdae6e66733f9e20, priced at a $8.1 million market cap across 9,063 wallets on the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
For a four-day-old asset the structure is uncommonly clean: the contract cannot mint, cannot pause, cannot blacklist, and isn't a proxy — the locked set behind grade A — while the top ten wallets hold about 23.5%, a genuinely spread float for a launch. The tracked pool of $670 thousand is real depth for a debut week, though still thin against the cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HUMA or GSTOCK?
By tracked market cap: HUMA (BNB Chain) measures $55.57M and GSTOCK (BNB Chain) measures $8.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HUMA or GSTOCK?
On the contract checks we publish: HUMA (BNB Chain) grades A and GSTOCK (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HUMA and GSTOCK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show HUMA at −10.4% and GSTOCK at −56.2%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.