HostHUMA vs GENIUS — price, size and safety, side by side
HUMA (BNB Chain) vs GENIUS (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
HUMA vs GENIUS — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| HUMA | GENIUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02741 | $0.3058 |
| Market cap | $55.57M | $114.22M |
| 24h volume | $2.83M DEX | $1.20M DEX |
| Liquidity | $703.26K | $659.82K |
| FDV | $14.64M | $324.90M |
| Holders | 4,721 | 23,163 |
| Age (days) | 501 | 162 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- GENIUS measures ~2.1× the market cap of HUMA
- HUMA measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of GENIUS
- GENIUS measures ~4.9× the holder count of HUMA
What the data says
HUMA
There's a lot to like about how HUMA's contract is set up. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HUMA earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HUMA shows $703.26K of on-chain liquidity, 4,721 wallets holding and an established 501-day history as of 2026-10-09. Set the $703.26K of depth beside roughly $55.57M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 4,721 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
GENIUS
GENIUS at 0x1f12b85aac097e43aa1555b2881e98a51090e9a6 is a young BNB Chain asset — 162 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $114.2 million market cap with a $324.9 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units showing the majority of supply still ahead.
The measured contradictions are the story. The contract is locked: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. But the ten largest wallets hold 98.4% of supply, and 23,163 holders share the remainder — a locked contract over a concentrated book. $659.8 thousand of thin tracked depth sees $19.4 million of 24-hour volume — a tape turning over twenty-seven times the pool daily, the signature of a heavily routed asset rather than a pool-traded one.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HUMA or GENIUS?
By tracked market cap: HUMA (BNB Chain) measures $55.57M and GENIUS (BNB Chain) measures $114.22M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HUMA or GENIUS?
On the contract checks we publish: HUMA (BNB Chain) grades A and GENIUS (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HUMA and GENIUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show HUMA at −10.4% and GENIUS at −7.91%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.