HostHUMA vs BASED — price, size and safety, side by side
HUMA (BNB Chain) vs BASED (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
HUMA vs BASED — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| HUMA | BASED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02741 | $0.05226 |
| Market cap | $55.57M | $15.40M |
| 24h volume | $2.83M DEX | $2.70M DEX |
| Liquidity | $703.26K | $659.16K |
| FDV | $14.64M | $5.61M |
| Holders | 4,721 | — |
| Age (days) | 501 | 195 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- HUMA measures ~3.6× the market cap of BASED
- over the shared window HUMA moved −10.4% while BASED moved −22.0%
What the data says
HUMA
There's a lot to like about how HUMA's contract is set up. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HUMA earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HUMA shows $703.26K of on-chain liquidity, 4,721 wallets holding and an established 501-day history as of 2026-10-09. Set the $703.26K of depth beside roughly $55.57M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 4,721 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
BASED
BASED at 0x1d28d989f9e3ccb8b15d0cec601734514f958e4d — Based Token — is a 177-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $15.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $5.6 million fully-diluted figure priced on 86.2 million local units at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is workable and the tape is working: $659.2 thousand of tracked depth on $1.3 million of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HUMA or BASED?
By tracked market cap: HUMA (BNB Chain) measures $55.57M and BASED (BNB Chain) measures $15.40M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HUMA or BASED?
On the contract checks we publish: HUMA (BNB Chain) grades A and BASED (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HUMA and BASED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show HUMA at −10.4% and BASED at −22.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.