HostHSOL vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
HSOL (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
HSOL vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| HSOL | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $124.07 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $114.37M | $51.57M |
| 24h volume | $517.53K DEX | $2.11M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $114.37M | $51.57M |
| Holders | 11,077 | 3,660 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- HSOL measures ~2.2× the market cap of JUICED
- JUICED measures ~4.1× the 24h volume of HSOL
- HSOL measures ~3.0× the holder count of JUICED
What the data says
HSOL
hSOL comes from the company most Solana developers already depend on without thinking about it. Helius runs a huge share of the chain's RPC infrastructure — the nodes applications talk to — and parlayed that operational credibility into a liquid staking token: stake through Helius, receive hSOL at mint he1iusmfkpAdwvxLNGV8Y1iSbj4rUy6yMhEA3fotn9A, earn validator rewards with the pitch of zero fees and stake supporting Helius's validator operation. The October 6, 2026 snapshot shows roughly $114.4 million staked across 11,077 holders — a developer-skewed crowd, fittingly.
Class mechanics, present and correct: freeze authority revoked, so no holder's balance can be locked; supply minted and burned by the stake pool program as stake flows — the liquid-staking engine rather than a discretionary mint; value compounding against SOL as rewards land. Like jupSOL, hSOL concentrates stake toward its sponsor's validator, so the same honest trade applies: excellent staker economics, paid for by nudging the network's stake distribution toward one well-run operator.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HSOL or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: HSOL (Solana) measures $114.37M and JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HSOL or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: HSOL (Solana) grades A and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HSOL and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show HSOL at +1.75% and JUICED at +0.55%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.