HostHNT vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
HNT (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
HNT vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| HNT | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4559 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $75.94M | — |
| 24h volume | $185.78K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $252.95K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $75.94M | — |
| Holders | 537,731 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~6,890× the liquidity of HNT
- RDK measures ~15,537× the 24h volume of HNT
- over the shared window HNT moved −19.6% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
HNT
HNT is one of the few tokens on this site attached to something you can photograph: hundreds of thousands of physical Helium hotspots providing IoT and mobile wireless coverage, earning tokens for verified work. The network launched its own blockchain in 2019 and migrated wholesale to Solana in April 2023 — one of the largest chain migrations ever completed — where the mint hntyVP6YFm1Hg25TN9WGLqM12b8TQmcknKrdu1oxWux now carries roughly $75.9 million of market capitalization across 537,731 holders as of HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot.
The authority read needs its context. Freeze authority: revoked — no one can lock a holder's balance. Mint authority: not the burned-forever state a memecoin checklist wants, and correctly so, because HNT's supply is emissive by design: the protocol mints new HNT on a public issuance schedule with halvings (most recently August 2025), paying hotspot operators for coverage, under a hard cap of 223 million. Like a liquid-staking token, the mint lever here belongs to the protocol's own program doing its documented job — the question to monitor is governance over that program, not the lever's existence.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HNT or RDK?
By tracked market cap: HNT (Solana) measures $75.94M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HNT or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: HNT (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HNT and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show HNT at −19.6% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
HNT vs RYYHNT vs FKBHNT vs CRDHNT vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.