HostH vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
H (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
H vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| H | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1204 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.55M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.19M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 5 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~1,671× the liquidity of H
- CRD measures ~2,603× the 24h volume of H
What the data says
H
H is Humanity Protocol's token — a palm-scan proof-of-personhood network, one of the "prove you're human without a government ID" projects that the AI era made fashionable. The contract 0xe76c5b78f93909d34404e9eb4c1f19e7582a5de1 is what our scan tracks, at $1.2 million of pool liquidity as of August 17, 2026.
The honest note: personhood tokens are a bet on two unproven things at once — that the biometric approach wins the Sybil-resistance market, and that the token captures the win. Biometric systems also carry a non-deletable risk shape: a leaked palm template can't be rotated like a password. Watch adoption metrics over narrative.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, H or CRD?
By tracked market cap: H (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, H or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: H (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have H and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show H at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
H vs RYYH vs FKBH vs RDKH vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.