Open app

GULD vs NES — price, size and safety, side by side

GULD (Ethereum) vs NES (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

GULDB

$0.02103
GULD on Ethereum
Trade GULD
vs

NESB

$0.2218
Nesa on Ethereum
Trade NES

GULD vs NES — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
GULD 0.00%  ·  NES 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
GULDNES
Price$0.02103$0.2218
Market cap
24h volume$1.09M$1.50M
Liquidity$1.80M$1.59M
FDV
Holders
Age (days)12450
Safety gradeBB

What the data says

GULD

GULD is a gold-themed Ethereum token — the name suggests the same tokenized-gold ambition as PAXG's class, at a fraction of the depth. The contract 0x14d6c649292c5c9790c5196d1a9ea039307947a1 carries September 14, 2026 snapshot liquidity of $1.8 million.

The honest caveat for the name: gold branding on a token proves nothing about gold backing — PAXG's claim is a regulated NYDFS trust with LBMA vaults; a small "gold" token's claim is whatever its issuer says it is. Whether GULD is a genuine metal-backed asset or a theme coin trading on the ticker is exactly what the contract and issuer checks exist to resolve.

Full GULD safety read →

NES

Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our August 17, 2026 read shows $1.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.

The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.

Full NES safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, GULD or NES?

By tracked market cap: GULD (Ethereum) measures — and NES (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, GULD or NES?

On the contract checks we publish: GULD (Ethereum) grades B and NES (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have GULD and NES performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GULD at 0.00% and NES at 0.00%.

More comparisons

GULD vs RYYGULD vs FKBGULD vs CRDGULD vs RDKNES vs RYYNES vs FKBNES vs CRDNES vs RDK

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.