HostGRT vs SNX — price, size and safety, side by side
GRT (Ethereum) vs SNX (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GRT vs SNX — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| GRT | SNX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02869 | $0.2588 |
| Market cap | $313.95M | $150.37M |
| 24h volume | $22.25K | $11.98K |
| Liquidity | $128.33K | $104.19K |
| FDV | $309.90M | $150.19M |
| Holders | 171,927 | 87,651 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- GRT measures ~2.1× the market cap of SNX
- GRT measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of SNX
- GRT measures ~2.0× the holder count of SNX
What the data says
GRT
The most important thing to know about GRT is its authority setup. Right now GRT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 61/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, GRT is showing thin liquidity of $128.33K and 171,927 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $128.33K pool against roughly $313.95M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. With 171,927 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created GRT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
SNX
One detail on SNX didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-27 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where SNX stands today: thin liquidity of $104.19K and 87,651 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $150.37M, that $104.19K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 87,651-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-09-27, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GRT or SNX?
By tracked market cap: GRT (Ethereum) measures $313.95M and SNX (Ethereum) measures $150.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GRT or SNX?
On the contract checks we publish: GRT (Ethereum) grades C and SNX (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GRT and SNX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show GRT at 0.00% and SNX at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FRAX vs GRTGRT vs RFCGRT vs SCFGRT vs HABITATCANDLE vs SNXRWA vs SNXSTUPID vs SNXSNX vs KOX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.