HostGRT vs ATH — price, size and safety, side by side
GRT (Ethereum) vs ATH (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GRT vs ATH — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| GRT | ATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02869 | $20.39 |
| Market cap | $313.95M | — |
| 24h volume | $22.25K | $94.45K |
| Liquidity | $128.33K | $1.45M |
| FDV | $309.90M | $34.63M |
| Holders | 171,927 | 25,650 |
| Age (days) | — | 116 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- ATH measures ~11× the liquidity of GRT
- ATH measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of GRT
- GRT measures ~6.7× the holder count of ATH
What the data says
GRT
The most important thing to know about GRT is its authority setup. Right now GRT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 61/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, GRT is showing thin liquidity of $128.33K and 171,927 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $128.33K pool against roughly $313.95M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. With 171,927 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created GRT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
ATH
One detail on ATH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-27 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where ATH stands today: $1.45M of on-chain liquidity, 25,650 wallets holding and a maturing record at 116 days as of 2026-09-27. Read $1.45M of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 25,650 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ATH holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GRT or ATH?
By tracked market cap: GRT (Ethereum) measures $313.95M and ATH (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GRT or ATH?
On the contract checks we publish: GRT (Ethereum) grades C and ATH (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GRT and ATH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show GRT at 0.00% and ATH at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FRAX vs GRTGRT vs RFCGRT vs SCFGRT vs HABITATATH vs ZENATH vs MKRATH vs TSLAXATH vs TEL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.