HostGRND vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
GRND (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GRND vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GRND | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $15.42 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $213.99K | — |
| 24h volume | $703.92K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $261.37K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $213.99K | — |
| Holders | 7,300 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~7,595× the liquidity of GRND
- CRD measures ~5,722× the 24h volume of GRND
What the data says
GRND
A tokenized representation of Grindr (GRND) equity exposure under Backpack Securities. Mint GRNDYDpqwpCm6jVxpbh4xT5AM4r3p391qYsKTHqgaET2; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $261 thousand of liquidity, roughly 7,300 holders, and a tracked value near $214 thousand.
Standard tokenized-stock anatomy: the token tracks the share price through the issuer's custody/hedging — synthetic exposure, not share ownership. No votes, no SIPC, no direct claim on Grindr Inc.; in exchange, 24/7 settlement and on-chain transferability.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GRND or CRD?
By tracked market cap: GRND (Solana) measures $213.99K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GRND or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: GRND (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GRND and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GRND at −0.35% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GRND vs RYYGRND vs FKBGRND vs RDKGRND vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.