HostGNS vs DIMO — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs DIMO (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
GNS vs DIMO — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| GNS | DIMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4578 | $0.01971 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $22.11M |
| 24h volume | $21.37K DEX | $90.23K DEX |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $21.19K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $20.12M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 80,375 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 1,388 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- DIMO measures ~1.9× the market cap of GNS
- GNS measures ~10× the liquidity of DIMO
- DIMO measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of GNS
- DIMO measures ~5.7× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window GNS moved +27.0% while DIMO moved −56.0%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
DIMO
One detail on DIMO didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On liquidity and holders, DIMO shows $21.19K of on-chain liquidity, 80,375 wallets holding and an established record at 1,388 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $21.19K of depth against a market cap of about $22.11M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: DIMO reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 80,375-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or DIMO?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and DIMO (Polygon) measures $22.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or DIMO?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and DIMO (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and DIMO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show GNS at +27.0% and DIMO at −56.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.