HostGNON vs ZAUTH — price, size and safety, side by side
GNON (Solana) vs ZAUTH (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
GNON vs ZAUTH — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GNON | ZAUTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001416 | $0.00138 |
| Market cap | $136.72K | $1.25M |
| 24h volume | $29 | $16.68K |
| Liquidity | $67.31K | $67.13K |
| FDV | $136.72K | $1.25M |
| Holders | 20,222 | 2,384 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAUTH measures ~9.2× the market cap of GNON
- ZAUTH measures ~575× the 24h volume of GNON
- GNON measures ~8.5× the holder count of ZAUTH
- over the shared window GNON moved −4.60% while ZAUTH moved −15.7%
What the data says
GNON
numogram — GNON — the token attached to an AI-concept project (the "Lumpen Space" / GNON agent-research persona that briefly became the agent-sector's philosophical mascot) — on Solana at mint HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $67 thousand of liquidity and roughly 20,222 holders.
GNON had a genuinely unusual moment — it ran to a massive valuation on the strength of an AI persona and an "agent economy" narrative, and then its own originator publicly detached from it, which is the cleanest possible illustration of persona-token risk: the asset's value was the association, and the association left.
ZAUTH
zauthx402 — ZAUTH — an x402-sector token (the agent-payments protocol wave: HTTP-native micropayments for machine clients) on Solana at mint DNhQZ1CE9qZ2FNrVhsCXwQJ2vZG8ufZkcYakTS5Jpump. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $67 thousand of liquidity and roughly 2,384 holders.
The x402 narrative is real — machine-to-machine payments is a genuine emerging category — and sector tokens on it are thesis-priced: the bet is that this project's rails get used, not that current volume proves it. The honest scan-can't-answer question is whether agent traffic actually flows through it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNON or ZAUTH?
By tracked market cap: GNON (Solana) measures $136.72K and ZAUTH (Solana) measures $1.25M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNON or ZAUTH?
On the contract checks we publish: GNON (Solana) grades A and ZAUTH (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNON and ZAUTH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GNON at −4.60% and ZAUTH at −15.7%.
More comparisons
GNON vs RYYGNON vs FKBGNON vs CRDGNON vs RDKZAUTH vs RYYZAUTH vs FKBZAUTH vs CRDZAUTH vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.