HostGMT vs RISE — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Polygon) vs RISE (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
GMT vs RISE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| GMT | RISE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007546 | $0.0004876 |
| Market cap | $25.94M | — |
| 24h volume | $30.20K DEX | $31.48K DEX |
| Liquidity | $621.92K | $601.03K |
| FDV | $16.23M | $2.48M |
| Holders | 46,298 | 93,329 |
| Age (days) | 963 | 165 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RISE measures ~2.0× the holder count of GMT
- over the shared window GMT moved −9.48% while RISE moved −93.3%
What the data says
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The October 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
RISE
RISE — 0xcfb287565201763743a77c556dca44a673d0a777 — is the RISE Token on Polygon, five and a half months old and held in nearly a hundred thousand wallets.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $601.0 thousand of tracked depth and 93,329 holders against a fully diluted valuation of $2.5 million — the market-cap field is empty in this read. The day's print is heavy: -11.3%. One caution on the concentration figure: the top-ten custody read overflows past 100%, which says the distribution math hit a data edge case rather than producing a usable number — treat custody concentration as unknown, not clean.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or RISE?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M and RISE (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or RISE?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Polygon) grades B and RISE (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and RISE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show GMT at −9.48% and RISE at −93.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.