HostGMT vs PLAY — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Polygon) vs PLAY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
GMT vs PLAY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| GMT | PLAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007546 | $0.01763 |
| Market cap | $25.94M | $11.67M |
| 24h volume | $30.20K DEX | $1.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $621.92K | $301.30K |
| FDV | $16.23M | $124.98M |
| Holders | 46,298 | 6,454 |
| Age (days) | 963 | 140 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- GMT measures ~2.2× the market cap of PLAY
- GMT measures ~2.1× the liquidity of PLAY
- PLAY measures ~35× the 24h volume of GMT
- GMT measures ~7.2× the holder count of PLAY
- over the shared window GMT moved −9.48% while PLAY moved −43.5%
What the data says
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The October 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or PLAY?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M and PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or PLAY?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Polygon) grades B and PLAY (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and PLAY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show GMT at −9.48% and PLAY at −43.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.