HostGM vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
GM (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
GM vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| GM | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001598 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $1.63M | — |
| 24h volume | $0.04121 | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $258.30K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $1.63M | — |
| Holders | 1,527 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~7,685× the liquidity of GM
- CRD measures ~97,730,411,215× the 24h volume of GM
What the data says
GM
The best news on GM is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The mint power is gone, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and freeze has been renounced as well, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts GM at 82/100 as of the 2026-09-16 snapshot.
Looking at the market data, GM shows deep liquidity of $258.30K and 1,527 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. Encouragingly, that $258.30K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $1.63M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 1,527-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The figure to weigh heavily is the creator's own wallet: it still holds 67.2% of GM's supply as of 2026-09-16 — a stake big enough to move the price or sell into the market, which makes it the dominant risk on this page.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GM or CRD?
By tracked market cap: GM (Solana) measures $1.63M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GM or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: GM (Solana) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GM and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show GM at −2.10% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GM vs RYYGM vs FKBGM vs RDKGM vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.