HostGITLAWB vs BASECAT — price, size and safety, side by side
GITLAWB (Base) vs BASECAT (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-16.
GITLAWB vs BASECAT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| GITLAWB | BASECAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000163 | $0.01269 |
| Market cap | $6.09M | $19.61M |
| 24h volume | $1.50M DEX | $458.46K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.90M | $1.85M |
| FDV | $6.05M | $19.61M |
| Holders | 11,544 | 9,121 |
| Age (days) | 194 | 30 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- BASECAT measures ~3.2× the market cap of GITLAWB
- GITLAWB measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of BASECAT
- over the shared window GITLAWB moved −73.3% while BASECAT moved −36.0%
What the data says
GITLAWB
GITLAWB at 0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3 is a Base asset 194 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $6.1 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
The book is unusually liquid for the cap: $1.9 million of tracked depth is deep — nearly a third of the valuation — and the $1.5 million daily volume nearly cycles the whole pool every day, a genuinely active tape rather than a dormant holding. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
BASECAT
BASECAT on Base — contract 0xb2000000000000000000004c27f6523082f41d01 — is the largest survivor of the `0xb20000…` factory deployer indexed here: $1.9 million of liquidity and $5.2 million of daily volume at its October 6, 2026 snapshot, sixteen days old — ancient by factory-cohort standards.
Sixteen days is the meaningful number: the sibling contracts from this deployer (cookcat, plumber, dogue) were all single-digit days old at their snapshots — Basecat is the one the market kept. A 16x daily turnover on $330k of liquidity is still manufacturing-flavored flow, but survival past two weeks separates it from the churn that dies in 72 hours.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GITLAWB or BASECAT?
By tracked market cap: GITLAWB (Base) measures $6.09M and BASECAT (Base) measures $19.61M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GITLAWB or BASECAT?
On the contract checks we publish: GITLAWB (Base) grades B and BASECAT (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GITLAWB and BASECAT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show GITLAWB at −73.3% and BASECAT at −36.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.