HostGHO vs CBBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
GHO (Ethereum) vs CBBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
GHO vs CBBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| GHO | CBBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9991 | $81.40K |
| Market cap | $698.92M | $7.87B |
| 24h volume | $5.40M DEX | $16.02M DEX |
| Liquidity | $34.16M | $77.45M |
| FDV | $698.92M | $3.69B |
| Holders | 8,156 | 89,170 |
| Age (days) | 386 | 386 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CBBTC measures ~11× the market cap of GHO
- CBBTC measures ~2.3× the liquidity of GHO
- CBBTC measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of GHO
- CBBTC measures ~11× the holder count of GHO
What the data says
GHO
GHO is Aave's native stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited in the Aave protocol, with its monetary policy governed by Aave governance. The contract 0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f is what our scan tracks: $34.2 million of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: GHO is overcollateralized-debt stablecoin design — borrowers mint it against Aave collateral, so its backing is the health of Aave's markets rather than a bank account. Peg deviations are the figure to watch: a stablecoin that trades below peg is the market pricing the collateral-and-arbitrage machinery's speed, and GHO's history includes real time spent under a dollar before stabilizers matured.
CBBTC
CBBTC — "Coinbase Wrapped BTC" on Ethereum, 0xcbb7c0000ab88b473b1f5afd9ef808440eed33bf — is Coinbase's custodied bitcoin wrapper: each unit a claim on BTC held by the exchange's custody arm.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $77.4 million of liquidity against an $8.06 billion market cap, roughly $5.7 million of daily volume, at an $81,540 unit price that tracks BTC spot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHO or CBBTC?
By tracked market cap: GHO (Ethereum) measures $698.92M and CBBTC (Ethereum) measures $7.87B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHO or CBBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: GHO (Ethereum) grades B and CBBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHO and CBBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show GHO at +0.11% and CBBTC at +4.50%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.