HostGALABET vs 79AU — price, size and safety, side by side
GALABET (BNB Chain) vs 79AU (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
GALABET vs 79AU — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| GALABET | 79AU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.48 | $5.92 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $144.64M DEX | $4.62M DEX |
| Liquidity | $17.91M | $11.01M |
| FDV | $3.57030618053539e+47T | $1.20B |
| Holders | 52,665 | 41,285 |
| Age (days) | 293 | 132 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GALABET measures ~1.6× the liquidity of 79AU
- GALABET measures ~31× the 24h volume of 79AU
- over the shared window GALABET moved −96.1% while 79AU moved −5.36%
What the data says
GALABET
GALABET CASINO is a BNB Chain token tied to the betting site that shares its name, deployed at 0x6d6521283cd3fd0188fe0408e700a5790a0f6c61. This snapshot is dated October 9, 2026, 278 days after the contract first appeared.
The measured shape is unusual: $17.9 million of tracked liquidity and 52,665 holders, yet $2.3 billion traded in the last day — turnover roughly twenty-four times the pool itself, a signature of market-maker flow rather than organic buying. The top-ten wallets hold 100.0% of supply, so the entire float sits in a handful of accounts.
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.2 billion cap on $11.0 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GALABET or 79AU?
By tracked market cap: GALABET (BNB Chain) measures — and 79AU (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GALABET or 79AU?
On the contract checks we publish: GALABET (BNB Chain) grades B and 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GALABET and 79AU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show GALABET at −96.1% and 79AU at −5.36%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.