HostG vs LYN — price, size and safety, side by side
G (Ethereum) vs LYN (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
G vs LYN — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| G | LYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003892 | $0.01439 |
| Market cap | $45.30M | $4.51M |
| 24h volume | $2.25M DEX | $2.09M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.41M | $79.21K |
| FDV | $76.80M | $21.60M |
| Holders | 26,754 | 21,970 |
| Age (days) | 795 | 365 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- G measures ~10× the market cap of LYN
- G measures ~18× the liquidity of LYN
- over the shared window G moved −16.7% while LYN moved −33.8%
What the data says
G
G — "Gravity" on Ethereum, 0x9c7beba8f6ef6643abd725e45a4e8387ef260649 — is a single-letter ticker token carrying a $45.3 million market cap in the tracked book.
The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $1.4 million of liquidity, roughly $2.2 million of daily volume, at a $0.0063 unit price — daily turnover larger than the pool itself.
LYN
LYN has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. The mint function on LYN's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why LYN is at C (67/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, LYN shows workable liquidity of $79.21K, 21,970 holders and an established record at 365 days as of 2026-10-09. The $79.21K pool against a ~$4.51M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 21,970 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LYN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, G or LYN?
By tracked market cap: G (Ethereum) measures $45.30M and LYN (BNB Chain) measures $4.51M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, G or LYN?
On the contract checks we publish: G (Ethereum) grades B and LYN (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have G and LYN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show G at −16.7% and LYN at −33.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.