HostFWOG vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
FWOG (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FWOG vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FWOG | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004316 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $4.11M | — |
| 24h volume | $20.35K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $661.46K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $4.11M | — |
| Holders | 71,005 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~3,001× the liquidity of FWOG
- CRD measures ~197,903× the 24h volume of FWOG
- over the shared window FWOG moved −14.9% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
FWOG
FWOG is a frog memecoin born on pump.fun — its mint address literally ends in "pump" — that became one of the more durable community assets of the Solana meme cohort after its original deployer walked away and holders took it over. The September 16, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $4.1 million across 71,005 wallets on mint A8C3xuqscfmyLrte3VmTqrAq8kgMASius9AFNANwpump.
The community-takeover story is the whole asset: no utility, no issuer, no roadmap beyond what holders coordinate. What FWOG has unusually is liquidity — about $661.5 thousand tracked against a sub-$5M cap, a far healthier ratio than most pump.fun survivors ever carry.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FWOG or CRD?
By tracked market cap: FWOG (Solana) measures $4.11M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FWOG or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: FWOG (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FWOG and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FWOG at −14.9% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FWOG vs RYYFWOG vs FKBFWOG vs RDKFWOG vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.