HostFUN vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
FUN (Polygon) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
FUN vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FUN | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.45 | $12.27 |
| Market cap | — | $9.53B |
| 24h volume | $23.79K DEX | $1.95M DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.31M | $19.94M |
| FDV | $246.38M | $12.74B |
| Holders | 31,265 | 922,570 |
| Age (days) | 121 | 1,745 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~8.6× the liquidity of FUN
- LINK measures ~82× the 24h volume of FUN
- LINK measures ~30× the holder count of FUN
- over the shared window FUN moved −31.9% while LINK moved −3.35%
What the data says
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $246.4 million market cap against $2.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $19.9 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUN or LINK?
By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures — and LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.53B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUN or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUN and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FUN at −31.9% and LINK at −3.35%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.