Open app

FUN vs ICP — price, size and safety, side by side

FUN (Polygon) vs ICP (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-16.

FUNA

$5.45
FunPay on Polygon
Trade FUN
vs

ICPB

$3.00
ICP on Base
Trade ICP

FUN vs ICP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45

100 — shared start
FUN −31.9%  ·  ICP −1.01% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
FUNICP
Price$5.45$3.00
Market cap—$1.90B
24h volume$23.79K DEX$979.59K DEX
Liquidity$2.31M$316.44K
FDV$246.38M$810.69K
Holders31,2656,579
Age (days)121335
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

FUN

FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $246.4 million market cap against $2.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.

The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.

ICP

ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.9 billion market cap dwarfs the $810.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.

The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $316.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

FAQ

Which is bigger, FUN or ICP?

By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures — and ICP (Base) measures $1.90B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, FUN or ICP?

On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and ICP (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have FUN and ICP performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FUN at −31.9% and ICP at −1.01%.

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.