HostFUN vs CBZEC — price, size and safety, side by side
FUN (Polygon) vs CBZEC (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FUN vs CBZEC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FUN | CBZEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.45 | $1.08K |
| Market cap | — | $8.37M |
| 24h volume | $23.79K DEX | $2.29M DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.31M | $316.04K |
| FDV | $246.38M | $8.37M |
| Holders | 31,265 | 2,622 |
| Age (days) | 121 | 38 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FUN measures ~7.3× the liquidity of CBZEC
- CBZEC measures ~96× the 24h volume of FUN
- FUN measures ~12× the holder count of CBZEC
What the data says
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $246.4 million market cap against $2.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
CBZEC
cbZEC at 0xb2000000000000000000008501b13360000cb2ec — Coinbase Wrapped ZEC — is the exchange-issued wrapped claim on Zcash on Base, just 20 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $8.4 million market cap across 2.9 thousand units.
The launch book is workable and the tape is hot: $316.0 thousand of tracked depth on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling eight times daily, a real trading book under a young float. What the snapshot cannot say is what the custody is worth: a wrapped claim's backing lives in the issuer's reserve, not on-chain at this address.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUN or CBZEC?
By tracked market cap: FUN (Polygon) measures — and CBZEC (Base) measures $8.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUN or CBZEC?
On the contract checks we publish: FUN (Polygon) grades A and CBZEC (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUN and CBZEC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FUN at −31.9% and CBZEC at −29.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.