HostFT vs SCUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
FT (Sonic) vs SCUSD (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FT vs SCUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FT | SCUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1436 | $0.9943 |
| Market cap | $72.17M | $1.92M |
| 24h volume | $25.89K DEX | $5.35K DEX |
| Liquidity | $189.39K | $93.38K |
| FDV | $394.06K | $643.69K |
| Holders | — | 9,491 |
| Age (days) | 69 | 626 |
| Safety grade | D | E |
Where they differ
- FT measures ~38× the market cap of SCUSD
- FT measures ~2.0× the liquidity of SCUSD
- FT measures ~4.8× the 24h volume of SCUSD
What the data says
FT
The most important thing to know about FT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 41/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On liquidity and holders, FT shows a $189.39K pool and a young record at 69 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $189.39K pool against roughly $72.17M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
SCUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on SCUSD to flag. Right now SCUSD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. That's what's holding the score at 39/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Here's where SCUSD stands today: a $93.38K pool, 9,491 wallets holding and 626 days old as of 2026-10-09. The $93.38K pool against a ~$1.92M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 9,491 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SCUSD as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FT or SCUSD?
By tracked market cap: FT (Sonic) measures $72.17M and SCUSD (Sonic) measures $1.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FT or SCUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: FT (Sonic) grades D and SCUSD (Sonic) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FT and SCUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FT at −3.24% and SCUSD at −0.64%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.