HostFT vs FIVE — price, size and safety, side by side
FT (Sonic) vs FIVE (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FT vs FIVE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FT | FIVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1436 | $0.0002623 |
| Market cap | $72.17M | $300.88K |
| 24h volume | $25.89K DEX | $2.32K DEX |
| Liquidity | $189.39K | $35.33K |
| FDV | $394.06K | $427.45K |
| Holders | — | 7,567 |
| Age (days) | 69 | 589 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- FT measures ~240× the market cap of FIVE
- FT measures ~5.4× the liquidity of FIVE
- FT measures ~11× the 24h volume of FIVE
- over the shared window FT moved −3.24% while FIVE moved +4.72%
What the data says
FT
The most important thing to know about FT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 41/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On liquidity and holders, FT shows a $189.39K pool and a young record at 69 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $189.39K pool against roughly $72.17M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FIVE
The most important thing to know about FIVE is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, FIVE shows deep liquidity of $35.33K, 7,567 wallets holding and 589 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $300.88K in market cap, the $35.33K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 7,567-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FIVE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FT or FIVE?
By tracked market cap: FT (Sonic) measures $72.17M and FIVE (Sonic) measures $300.88K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FT or FIVE?
On the contract checks we publish: FT (Sonic) grades D and FIVE (Sonic) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FT and FIVE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FT at −3.24% and FIVE at +4.72%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.