HostFT vs EQUAL — price, size and safety, side by side
FT (Sonic) vs EQUAL (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FT vs EQUAL — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FT | EQUAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1436 | $0.1668 |
| Market cap | $72.17M | $191.64K |
| 24h volume | $25.89K DEX | $1.49K DEX |
| Liquidity | $189.39K | $35.80K |
| FDV | $394.06K | $797.78K |
| Holders | — | 10,888 |
| Age (days) | 69 | 654 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- FT measures ~377× the market cap of EQUAL
- FT measures ~5.3× the liquidity of EQUAL
- FT measures ~17× the 24h volume of EQUAL
- over the shared window FT moved −3.24% while EQUAL moved +22.0%
What the data says
FT
The most important thing to know about FT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 41/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On liquidity and holders, FT shows a $189.39K pool and a young record at 69 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $189.39K pool against roughly $72.17M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
EQUAL
One detail on EQUAL didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, EQUAL shows a $35.80K pool, a holder base of 10,888 and an established 654-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $35.80K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $191.64K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 10,888 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FT or EQUAL?
By tracked market cap: FT (Sonic) measures $72.17M and EQUAL (Sonic) measures $191.64K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FT or EQUAL?
On the contract checks we publish: FT (Sonic) grades D and EQUAL (Sonic) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FT and EQUAL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FT at −3.24% and EQUAL at +22.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.