HostFRXUSD vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
FRXUSD (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FRXUSD vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FRXUSD | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9954 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.89M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $14.90M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 431 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~133× the liquidity of FRXUSD
- CRD measures ~2,135× the 24h volume of FRXUSD
What the data says
FRXUSD
FRXUSD is Frax's dollar — the stablecoin of the protocol that pioneered fractional-algorithmic backing and later migrated to full collateralization, now issued against custodied reserves and yield-bearing positions. The deployment 0xcacd6fd266af91b8aed52accc382b4e165586e29 is the Ethereum mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $14.9 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest arc: Frax started as the algorithmic stable that held its peg with a collateral ratio dial — a design that survived the 2022 stablecoin shakeout where most algorithmics didn't — and the protocol has since moved toward conventional backing, which makes current frxUSD a different risk than its origin story suggests. The evolution is the point of checking the current reserve shape rather than the 2021 reputation.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FRXUSD or CRD?
By tracked market cap: FRXUSD (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FRXUSD or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: FRXUSD (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FRXUSD and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FRXUSD at −0.29% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FRXUSD vs RYYFRXUSD vs FKBFRXUSD vs RDKFRXUSD vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.