HostFLING vs EARNAUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
FLING (Monad) vs EARNAUSD (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-15.
FLING vs EARNAUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FLING | EARNAUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000065 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | $24.55M |
| 24h volume | $8.27K DEX | $180.49 DEX |
| Liquidity | $14.78K | $2.85K |
| FDV | $113.67K | $25.15M |
| Holders | 496 | 2,607 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 12 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- FLING measures ~5.2× the liquidity of EARNAUSD
- FLING measures ~46× the 24h volume of EARNAUSD
- EARNAUSD measures ~5.3× the holder count of FLING
- over the shared window FLING moved −69.6% while EARNAUSD moved +3.90%
What the data says
FLING
FLING is an early-stage token on Monad — the new high-throughput EVM chain whose token economy is still young. The contract 0xa9da3c77ec7cdc4dfaa1fe142af583543d1c540f is what our scan tracks: $15 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest frame for early Monad tokens generally: the chain itself is new, so every asset on it is early-stage by definition — thin pools, fast narratives, and a market that has not sorted winners from launch-week noise yet. Twenty-seven thousand dollars of liquidity is the practical fact: size any position against the pool, not the storyline.
EARNAUSD
earnAUSD is a yield-bearing dollar token on Monad — 23.9 million units priced at $1.011, a tracked market cap of $24.6 million. Tokens like this are deposit receipts: you hold AUSD-yield exposure and the price drifts above a dollar as yield accrues. The premium to $1.00 is the mechanism working.
The risk structure is concentrated, though. 2,607 holders is a modest base for a $30M token, and the top-10 wallets hold 95.5% of supply — earnAUSD's market is effectively a vault held by a few dozen real positions. Tracked pool depth of $3 thousand is thin, but that understates exit reality for a yield token: redemptions run through the issuer, not the DEX. The B at 77/100 reflects an upgradeable proxy plus unassessed contract controls — normal for a managed yield product, real nonetheless.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLING or EARNAUSD?
By tracked market cap: FLING (Monad) measures — and EARNAUSD (Monad) measures $24.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLING or EARNAUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: FLING (Monad) grades C and EARNAUSD (Monad) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLING and EARNAUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FLING at −69.6% and EARNAUSD at +3.90%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.