HostFLING vs APRMON — price, size and safety, side by side
FLING (Monad) vs APRMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
FLING vs APRMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| FLING | APRMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000065 | $0.02457 |
| Market cap | — | $461.94K |
| 24h volume | $8.27K DEX | $38.75K DEX |
| Liquidity | $14.78K | $7.59K |
| FDV | $113.67K | $459.25K |
| Holders | 496 | 4,958 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 311 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- FLING measures ~1.9× the liquidity of APRMON
- APRMON measures ~4.7× the 24h volume of FLING
- APRMON measures ~10.0× the holder count of FLING
- over the shared window FLING moved −70.0% while APRMON moved −11.8%
What the data says
FLING
FLING is an early-stage token on Monad — the new high-throughput EVM chain whose token economy is still young. The contract 0xa9da3c77ec7cdc4dfaa1fe142af583543d1c540f is what our scan tracks: $15 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest frame for early Monad tokens generally: the chain itself is new, so every asset on it is early-stage by definition — thin pools, fast narratives, and a market that has not sorted winners from launch-week noise yet. Twenty-seven thousand dollars of liquidity is the practical fact: size any position against the pool, not the storyline.
APRMON
APRMON — aPriori's Monad liquid-staking token — is one of the first LSTs in this index on Monad: 0x0c65a0bc65a5d819235b71f554d210d3f80e0852, 293 days old on the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $461.9 thousand market cap across 4,958 wallets.
The structure flag is the one an LST can't avoid: the token sits behind a proxy, so the receipt logic is upgradeable — normal for staking infrastructure, real nonetheless. The float is fairly concentrated (top ten hold about 68.6%), and the venue is thin — $7.6 thousand of tracked liquidity against the cap, so exits are rationed by the pool, not the code.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLING or APRMON?
By tracked market cap: FLING (Monad) measures — and APRMON (Monad) measures $461.94K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLING or APRMON?
On the contract checks we publish: FLING (Monad) grades C and APRMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLING and APRMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show FLING at −70.0% and APRMON at −11.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.