HostFIVE vs JEFE — price, size and safety, side by side
FIVE (Sonic) vs JEFE (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
FIVE vs JEFE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| FIVE | JEFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0002623 | $0.03251 |
| Market cap | $300.88K | $299.30K |
| 24h volume | $2.32K DEX | $535.97 DEX |
| Liquidity | $35.33K | $19.90K |
| FDV | $427.45K | $299.25K |
| Holders | 7,567 | 28,629 |
| Age (days) | 589 | 75 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- FIVE measures ~1.8× the liquidity of JEFE
- FIVE measures ~4.3× the 24h volume of JEFE
- JEFE measures ~3.8× the holder count of FIVE
What the data says
FIVE
The most important thing to know about FIVE is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, FIVE shows deep liquidity of $35.33K, 7,567 wallets holding and 589 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $300.88K in market cap, the $35.33K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 7,567-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FIVE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
JEFE
The best news on JEFE is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason JEFE's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
On the trading data, JEFE shows $19.90K of on-chain liquidity, 28,629 holders and 75 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $19.90K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $299.30K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. The 28,629-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of JEFE as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FIVE or JEFE?
By tracked market cap: FIVE (Sonic) measures $300.88K and JEFE (Sonic) measures $299.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FIVE or JEFE?
On the contract checks we publish: FIVE (Sonic) grades C and JEFE (Sonic) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FIVE and JEFE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show FIVE at +4.72% and JEFE at +8.69%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.