HostFINGER vs ESE — price, size and safety, side by side
FINGER (Blast) vs ESE (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
FINGER vs ESE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| FINGER | ESE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00000001935 | $0.0008439 |
| Market cap | — | $752.15K |
| 24h volume | $7.03 DEX | $6.52 DEX |
| Liquidity | $9.32K | $867.75 |
| FDV | $13.98K | $15.95K |
| Holders | 4,273 | 42,894 |
| Age (days) | 953 | 397 |
| Safety grade | A | E |
Where they differ
- FINGER measures ~11× the liquidity of ESE
- ESE measures ~10× the holder count of FINGER
- over the shared window FINGER moved −3.99% while ESE moved −9.63%
What the data says
FINGER
Start with the good news — FINGER's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and no freeze-style control exists in the code, so your holdings stay liquid and movable. That leaves FINGER at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On liquidity and holders, FINGER shows thin liquidity of $9.32K, a holder base of 4,273 and 953 days old as of 2026-10-09. Treat $9.32K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. A 4,273-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FINGER holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
ESE
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on ESE to flag. Right now ESE's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. It's the main reason the read sits at 34/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, ESE carries thin liquidity of $868, a holder base of 42,894 and an established record at 397 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $868 pool against a ~$752.15K cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so ESE's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. 42,894 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FINGER or ESE?
By tracked market cap: FINGER (Blast) measures — and ESE (Blast) measures $752.15K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FINGER or ESE?
On the contract checks we publish: FINGER (Blast) grades A and ESE (Blast) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FINGER and ESE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show FINGER at −3.99% and ESE at −9.63%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.