HostFET vs ZCHF — price, size and safety, side by side
FET (Ethereum) vs ZCHF (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
FET vs ZCHF — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| FET | ZCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2004 | $1.20 |
| Market cap | $510.23M | $37.38M |
| 24h volume | $410.32K DEX | $750.29K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.69M | $1.41M |
| FDV | $599.16M | $37.38M |
| Holders | 165,300 | 2,121 |
| Age (days) | 1,388 | 951 |
| Safety grade | D | D |
Where they differ
- FET measures ~14× the market cap of ZCHF
- ZCHF measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of FET
- FET measures ~78× the holder count of ZCHF
- over the shared window FET moved −16.1% while ZCHF moved −0.12%
What the data says
FET
FET — 0xaea46a60368a7bd060eec7df8cba43b7ef41ad85 — is Fetch.ai's token, mid-merger: Fetch, SingularityNET and Ocean Protocol are combining into the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI), with FET as the merge's surviving ticker at the first stage. Holding this contract today means holding an asset whose own alliance is re-denominating it — liquidity, branding and mindshare are all in transit.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $510.2 million market cap against an $599.2 million FDV — most supply circulating — with $1.7 million of tracked pool depth and 165,300 holders. Workable depth for a mid-cap, though the market's real center of gravity sits on centralized venues during the migration.
ZCHF
Frankencoin (ZCHF) is a Swiss-franc stablecoin minted against overcollateralized positions — and unusually, its design lets anyone propose a new collateral type and bootstrap a minting position through a challenge-auction process, without leaning on the price-oracle dependency most stablecoins need. The contract 0xb58e61c3098d85632df34eecfb899a1ed80921cb is the mainnet deployment; our October 6, 2026 read shows $1.4 million of tracked liquidity.
The honest read: ZCHF is one of the more genuinely decentralized stablecoin designs in production — the trade-off is that demand for a Swiss-franc unit on-chain is structurally niche, and the system's safety rests on challenge auctions actually attracting challengers when collateral goes bad. Small, quirky, and technically interesting — treat it as a design experiment that works, not a deep-liquidity vehicle.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FET or ZCHF?
By tracked market cap: FET (Ethereum) measures $510.23M and ZCHF (Ethereum) measures $37.38M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FET or ZCHF?
On the contract checks we publish: FET (Ethereum) grades D and ZCHF (Ethereum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FET and ZCHF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show FET at −16.1% and ZCHF at −0.12%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.