HostFET vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
FET (Ethereum) vs 牛来 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-28.
FET vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| FET | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2389 | $0.1005 |
| Market cap | $552.32M | $111.63M |
| 24h volume | $242.69K | $5.62M |
| Liquidity | $1.89M | $1.85M |
| FDV | $648.58M | $111.63M |
| Holders | 165,380 | 65,574 |
| Age (days) | — | 37 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- FET measures ~4.9× the market cap of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~23× the 24h volume of FET
- FET measures ~2.5× the holder count of 牛来
What the data says
FET
One thing stands out on FET, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, leaving the deployer able to create new supply or freeze transfers for now. That's what's holding the score at 49/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Looking at the market data, FET shows $1.89M of on-chain liquidity and 165,380 holders as of 2026-09-27. The number worth sitting with is that $1.89M of depth against a market cap of about $552.32M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: FET reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A holder base of 165,380 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FET holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
牛来
牛来 at 0xbeea1d618e533a387d941f58a7d4c9b7bd377777 — a Chinese-language ticker, name and contract all reading as one — is a 37-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $111.6 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $1.8 million of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — real flow for a month-old book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FET or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: FET (Ethereum) measures $552.32M and 牛来 (BNB Chain) measures $111.63M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FET or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: FET (Ethereum) grades D and 牛来 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FET and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show FET at 0.00% and 牛来 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
NVDAC vs FETMON vs FETGITLAWB vs FETTROLL vs FET牛来 vs NEETALCH vs 牛来GOAT vs 牛来牛来 vs WNEAR
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.