Open app

EZSOL vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side

EZSOL (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

EZSOLA

$132.31
Renzo Restaked SOL on Solana
Trade EZSOL
vs

RDKB

$2.07K
Rudake on Base
Trade RDK

EZSOL vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
EZSOL −1.65%  ·  RDK 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
EZSOLRDK
Price$132.31$2.07K
Market cap$3.13M
24h volume$126.14$2.89B
Liquidity$2.68K$1.74B
FDV$3.13M
Holders3,551
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

EZSOL

EZSOL is Renzo's restaked SOL — a liquid-restaking token giving SOL price exposure plus EigenLayer-style restaking yield through Renzo's protocol. The mint ezSoL6fY1PVdJcJsUpe5CM3xkfmy3zoVCABybm5WtiC is what our scan tracks: $3.1 million market cap on $2.7 thousand of pool liquidity with 3,551 holders as of September 16, 2026.

The thin pool is structural, not a red flag by itself: restaking receipts mostly exit through the protocol's own unstake path rather than through public pools, so market depth stays small by design. The risk stack underneath is real though — SOL price, plus restaking slashing exposure, plus Renzo's contracts. Yield you cannot easily explain is yield you should price as risk.

Full EZSOL safety read →

RDK

Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.

Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.

Full RDK safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, EZSOL or RDK?

By tracked market cap: EZSOL (Solana) measures $3.13M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, EZSOL or RDK?

On the contract checks we publish: EZSOL (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have EZSOL and RDK performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EZSOL at −1.65% and RDK at 0.00%.

More comparisons

EZSOL vs RYYEZSOL vs FKBEZSOL vs CRDEZSOL vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.