HostEWBERA-4 vs OHM — price, size and safety, side by side
EWBERA-4 (Berachain) vs OHM (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
EWBERA-4 vs OHM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| EWBERA-4 | OHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3062 | $19 |
| Market cap | — | $284.11M |
| 24h volume | $5.57K DEX | $19.57 DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.42K | $598.54 |
| FDV | $445.89K | $1.34M |
| Holders | 7,799 | 6,902 |
| Age (days) | 508 | 605 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- EWBERA-4 measures ~2.4× the liquidity of OHM
- EWBERA-4 measures ~285× the 24h volume of OHM
- over the shared window EWBERA-4 moved −11.8% while OHM moved +0.04%
What the data says
EWBERA-4
There's a small gap on this page — EWBERA-4's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, EWBERA-4 carries a $1.42K pool, 7,799 wallets holding and 508 days old as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $1.42K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. A 7,799-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
OHM
OHM has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now OHM's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Until that changes, OHM stays around 60/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
On liquidity and holders, OHM shows thin liquidity of $599, 6,902 holders and an established record at 605 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $599 pool against roughly $284.11M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 6,902-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of OHM as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EWBERA-4 or OHM?
By tracked market cap: EWBERA-4 (Berachain) measures — and OHM (Berachain) measures $284.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EWBERA-4 or OHM?
On the contract checks we publish: EWBERA-4 (Berachain) grades B and OHM (Berachain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EWBERA-4 and OHM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show EWBERA-4 at −11.8% and OHM at +0.04%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.