HostEUSD vs ENS — price, size and safety, side by side
EUSD (Base) vs ENS (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-16.
EUSD vs ENS — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| EUSD | ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9941 | $5.61 |
| Market cap | $23.35M | $261.45M |
| 24h volume | $1.98M DEX | $19.55K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.10M | $766.82K |
| FDV | $17.70M | $618.48M |
| Holders | 25,072 | 67,003 |
| Age (days) | 853 | 1,734 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- ENS measures ~11× the market cap of EUSD
- EUSD measures ~101× the 24h volume of ENS
- ENS measures ~2.7× the holder count of EUSD
- over the shared window EUSD moved −0.26% while ENS moved −19.4%
What the data says
EUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on EUSD to flag. The mint function on EUSD's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why EUSD is at C (55/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On liquidity and holders, EUSD shows $1.10M of on-chain liquidity, 25,072 holders and 853 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $1.10M of depth beside roughly $23.35M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A 25,072-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
ENS
ENS — Ethereum Name Service at 0xc18360217d8f7ab5e7c516566761ea12ce7f9d72 — governs the protocol that maps .eth names to addresses, the closest thing Ethereum has to a DNS layer. If you have ever sent funds to a readable name instead of a hex string, you have used the thing this token votes over — which makes it one of the few governance tokens with a product nearly every Ethereum user has touched.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $261.4 million market cap against an $618.5 million FDV — under half the hundred-million supply circulating — with $766.8 thousand of tracked pool depth and 67,003 holders. Daily turnover is thin against the cap; the book fills retail orders but the price you see on-chain leans on larger venue flow.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EUSD or ENS?
By tracked market cap: EUSD (Base) measures $23.35M and ENS (Ethereum) measures $261.45M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EUSD or ENS?
On the contract checks we publish: EUSD (Base) grades C and ENS (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EUSD and ENS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show EUSD at −0.26% and ENS at −19.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.