HostEUSD vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
EUSD (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
EUSD vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| EUSD | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.01 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.17M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.54M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 744 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~1,291× the liquidity of EUSD
- CRD measures ~3,442× the 24h volume of EUSD
What the data says
EUSD
Electronic Dollar (eUSD) is a Reserve Protocol RToken — a stablecoin backed by a governed basket of yield-bearing collateral (aUSDC, cUSDC, sFRAX-type positions) rather than a single issuer's promise. The contract 0xa0d69e286b938e21cbf7e51d71f6a4c8918f482f is the mainnet deployment; our August 9, 2026 snapshot shows $1.5 million of tracked liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the basket design spreads issuer risk across several collateral tokens plus an overcollateralization layer, but it adds a new one — the basket's own governance and the Compound/Aave/Frax dependencies inside it. A diversified peg is still a peg; a serious de-peg in any major component hits eUSD too.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EUSD or CRD?
By tracked market cap: EUSD (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EUSD or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: EUSD (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EUSD and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EUSD at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
EUSD vs RYYEUSD vs FKBEUSD vs RDKEUSD vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.