HostESP vs SQD — price, size and safety, side by side
ESP (Arbitrum) vs SQD (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ESP vs SQD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| ESP | SQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.09327 | $0.02156 |
| Market cap | $83.85M | $37.76M |
| 24h volume | $320.68K DEX | $42.85K DEX |
| Liquidity | $236.50K | $192.69K |
| FDV | $9.20M | $38.30M |
| Holders | 3,444 | 17,087 |
| Age (days) | 237 | 824 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~2.2× the market cap of SQD
- ESP measures ~7.5× the 24h volume of SQD
- SQD measures ~5.0× the holder count of ESP
- over the shared window ESP moved −2.37% while SQD moved −22.5%
What the data says
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $236 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $37.8 million market cap prices nearly all of the $38.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $192.7 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ESP or SQD?
By tracked market cap: ESP (Arbitrum) measures $83.85M and SQD (Arbitrum) measures $37.76M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ESP or SQD?
On the contract checks we publish: ESP (Arbitrum) grades B and SQD (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ESP and SQD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show ESP at −2.37% and SQD at −22.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.