HostESP vs GNS — price, size and safety, side by side
ESP (Arbitrum) vs GNS (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ESP vs GNS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| ESP | GNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.09327 | $0.4578 |
| Market cap | $83.85M | $11.60M |
| 24h volume | $320.68K DEX | $21.37K DEX |
| Liquidity | $236.50K | $213.78K |
| FDV | $9.20M | $8.18M |
| Holders | 3,444 | 14,134 |
| Age (days) | 237 | 832 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~7.2× the market cap of GNS
- ESP measures ~15× the 24h volume of GNS
- GNS measures ~4.1× the holder count of ESP
- over the shared window ESP moved −2.37% while GNS moved +3.75%
What the data says
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $236 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ESP or GNS?
By tracked market cap: ESP (Arbitrum) measures $83.85M and GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ESP or GNS?
On the contract checks we publish: ESP (Arbitrum) grades B and GNS (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ESP and GNS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show ESP at −2.37% and GNS at +3.75%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.