HostEPIK vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
EPIK (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
EPIK vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| EPIK | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002378 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $1.95M | — |
| 24h volume | $20.43K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $173.57K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $1.95M | — |
| Holders | 16,452 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~11,437× the liquidity of EPIK
- CRD measures ~197,158× the 24h volume of EPIK
- over the shared window EPIK moved −14.3% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
EPIK
EPIK — TEH EPIK DUCK — is one of Solana's vintage memes, an intentionally-misspelled duck coin from the chain's early meme era that never quite died. The mint 3BgwJ8b7b9hHX4sgfZ2KJhv9496CoVfsMK2YePevsBRw is what our scan tracks: $1.9 million market cap, $174 thousand of liquidity and 16,452 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: heritage-meme status buys it a real pool and a wide base after multiple cycles — the longevity profile shared with STNK and SLERF. Nothing underneath but the joke that survived; for memes, survival is the closest thing to fundamentals that exists.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EPIK or CRD?
By tracked market cap: EPIK (Solana) measures $1.95M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EPIK or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: EPIK (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EPIK and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EPIK at −14.3% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
EPIK vs RYYEPIK vs FKBEPIK vs RDKEPIK vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.