HostELK vs SWASH — price, size and safety, side by side
ELK (Gnosis) vs SWASH (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ELK vs SWASH — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| ELK | SWASH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008499 | $0.0008136 |
| Market cap | $149.66K | $746.52K |
| 24h volume | $32.26 DEX | $318.85 DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.74K | $7.09K |
| FDV | $393.52K | $20.88K |
| Holders | 4,738 | 11,753 |
| Age (days) | 1,644 | 1,736 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- SWASH measures ~5.0× the market cap of ELK
- SWASH measures ~9.9× the 24h volume of ELK
- SWASH measures ~2.5× the holder count of ELK
- over the shared window ELK moved −8.37% while SWASH moved +8.43%
What the data says
ELK
ELK's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts ELK at 85/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
Looking at the market data, ELK shows $7.74K of on-chain liquidity, 4,738 holders and an established record at 1,644 days as of 2026-10-09. The $7.74K pool stands up well to a ~$149.66K cap — depth like that means ELK absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 4,738-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ELK holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
SWASH
The headline on SWASH is a permission the team still holds. Right now SWASH's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, SWASH shows thin liquidity of $7.09K, 11,753 holders and an established 1,736-day history as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $7.09K pool against a ~$746.52K cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so SWASH's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A 11,753-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ELK or SWASH?
By tracked market cap: ELK (Gnosis) measures $149.66K and SWASH (Gnosis) measures $746.52K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ELK or SWASH?
On the contract checks we publish: ELK (Gnosis) grades A and SWASH (Gnosis) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ELK and SWASH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show ELK at −8.37% and SWASH at +8.43%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.