HostELEVATE vs SHFL — price, size and safety, side by side
ELEVATE (Ethereum) vs SHFL (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
ELEVATE vs SHFL — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| ELEVATE | SHFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001504 | $0.5091 |
| Market cap | $546.05M | $204.06M |
| 24h volume | $659.60K DEX | $890.51K DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.63M | $4.45M |
| FDV | $534.05M | $384.60M |
| Holders | 2,415 | 8,010 |
| Age (days) | 211 | 937 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ELEVATE measures ~2.7× the market cap of SHFL
- SHFL measures ~3.3× the holder count of ELEVATE
- over the shared window ELEVATE moved −84.0% while SHFL moved +21.7%
What the data says
ELEVATE
Elevate is a mid-cap Ethereum token whose name carries the usual promise of its genre — the contract 0x888888888887715fb9d9f84175af9e6cce46807e is this row's identity, and our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $4.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note for this shape of asset: at this depth the page's job is the same as every ungraded-check page's — verify the contract, check the mint/freeze controls, look at the holder distribution — because a name like Elevate tells a buyer nothing about what the token actually does or who stands behind it. The figures above are what's measurable; the project's own documentation is what's not.
SHFL
SHFL passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. It's a reassuring starting point: 100/100 as of 2026-10-09, with the structural risks already off the table.
On liquidity and holders, SHFL shows $4.45M of on-chain liquidity, 8,010 holders and an established 937-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $204.06M, the $4.45M pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. A 8,010-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SHFL as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ELEVATE or SHFL?
By tracked market cap: ELEVATE (Ethereum) measures $546.05M and SHFL (Ethereum) measures $204.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ELEVATE or SHFL?
On the contract checks we publish: ELEVATE (Ethereum) grades B and SHFL (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ELEVATE and SHFL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show ELEVATE at −84.0% and SHFL at +21.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.