Open app

EFI vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side

EFI (Polygon) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-16.

EFID

$4.94
ElevateFi on Polygon
Trade EFI
vs

UNIA

$7.46
Uniswap on Ethereum
Trade UNI

EFI vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45

100 — shared start
EFI −29.1%  ·  UNI −22.4% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
EFIUNI
Price$4.94$7.46
Market cap$5.48M$4.61B
24h volume$45.61K DEX$2.16M DEX
Liquidity$227.33K$26.90M
FDV$7.16M$6.54B
Holders101,365383,059
Age (days)4121,745
Safety gradeDA

Where they differ

What the data says

EFI

EFI at 0xae840deab9916d80fadf42e218119a6051468169 is a Polygon asset 397 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $5.5 million market cap against a $7.2 million fully-diluted figure on a fixed-looking one-million-unit supply.

The book is workable for the cap: $227.3 thousand of tracked depth on $19.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet pool that can take ordinary exits. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

UNI

UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $26.9 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.

The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.

FAQ

Which is bigger, EFI or UNI?

By tracked market cap: EFI (Polygon) measures $5.48M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $4.61B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, EFI or UNI?

On the contract checks we publish: EFI (Polygon) grades D and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have EFI and UNI performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show EFI at −29.1% and UNI at −22.4%.

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.