Host一 vs CAP — price, size and safety, side by side
一 (BNB Chain) vs CAP (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-09.
一 vs CAP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-09T12:13:11
| 一 | CAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001118 | $0.07279 |
| Market cap | $3.39M | $132.68M |
| 24h volume | $1.55M DEX | $14.78M DEX |
| Liquidity | $172.97K | $128.82K |
| FDV | $4.26M | $17.42M |
| Holders | 74,515 | 4,390 |
| Age (days) | 249 | 103 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CAP measures ~39× the market cap of 一
- CAP measures ~9.5× the 24h volume of 一
- 一 measures ~17× the holder count of CAP
- over the shared window 一 moved −66.2% while CAP moved +59.2%
What the data says
一
一 — the name is the Chinese character for "one" — at 0xef91c1eae97edcd429a5ad197753a6c3e4214444 is 249 days into a BNB Chain record, 74,515 wallets holding a $3.4 million book at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot's rare quality is in the spread: the ten largest wallets hold about 9.8% of supply — the broadest top-10 distribution in this batch by a distance — while the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The contract cannot mint new supply and cannot pause or blacklist transfers, and its source is verified. The flagged item is modest liquidity: $173 thousand of tracked depth against a roughly $1.5-million daily tape — workable, but thin enough that size moves the price.
CAP
CAP at 0x99991c6aabba5a096f24f250b73580f5179b9999 — the contract begins and ends with nines — is an 88-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $132.7 million asset-wide market cap against a $17.4 million fully-diluted figure priced on 236.2 million local units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is hot: $128.8 thousand of tracked depth on $3.4 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself more than twelve times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 一 or CAP?
By tracked market cap: 一 (BNB Chain) measures $3.39M and CAP (BNB Chain) measures $132.68M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 一 or CAP?
On the contract checks we publish: 一 (BNB Chain) grades A and CAP (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 一 and CAP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-09T12:13:11, the measured snapshots show 一 at −66.2% and CAP at +59.2%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-09T12:13:11; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.