HostDOOD vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
DOOD (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
DOOD vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| DOOD | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001612 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $15.27M | — |
| 24h volume | $75.38K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $315.91K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $15.27M | — |
| Holders | 110,703 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~6,284× the liquidity of DOOD
- CRD measures ~53,435× the 24h volume of DOOD
- over the shared window DOOD moved −5.93% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
DOOD
DOOD is the token of Doodles, the NFT brand that crossed over from Ethereum profile pictures into mainstream collaborations before launching its token on Solana in 2025. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $15.3 million of market capitalization across 110,703 holders on mint DvjbEsdca43oQcw2h3HW1CT7N3x5vRcr3QrvTUHnXvgV — a base built substantially from an airdrop to the brand's collector community.
The structural read is complete and clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, both confirmed from the chain. Supply is fixed and no holder can be frozen mid-exit — the two failure modes that this format exists to catch are both closed, and the 100/100 records exactly that.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DOOD or CRD?
By tracked market cap: DOOD (Solana) measures $15.27M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DOOD or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: DOOD (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DOOD and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show DOOD at −5.93% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
DOOD vs RYYDOOD vs FKBDOOD vs RDKDOOD vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.