HostDOLO vs IBGT — price, size and safety, side by side
DOLO (Berachain) vs IBGT (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
DOLO vs IBGT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| DOLO | IBGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02538 | $0.1871 |
| Market cap | $13.98M | $567.09K |
| 24h volume | $3.95K DEX | $90.50 DEX |
| Liquidity | $88.37K | $38.00K |
| FDV | $19.94M | $567.09K |
| Holders | 15,924 | 25,840 |
| Age (days) | 533 | 588 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- DOLO measures ~25× the market cap of IBGT
- DOLO measures ~2.3× the liquidity of IBGT
- DOLO measures ~44× the 24h volume of IBGT
- IBGT measures ~1.6× the holder count of DOLO
- over the shared window DOLO moved −6.80% while IBGT moved −14.5%
What the data says
DOLO
Right at the foundation, DOLO does both of the things you'd hope to see. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. That leaves DOLO at a healthy 92/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
By the numbers, DOLO is showing a $88.37K pool, a holder base of 15,924 and an established record at 533 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $88.37K pool against roughly $13.98M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. A 15,924-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of DOLO as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
IBGT
The most important thing to know about IBGT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the market side, IBGT brings a $38.00K pool, 25,840 wallets holding and an established 588-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $567.09K in market cap, the $38.00K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 25,840-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created IBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DOLO or IBGT?
By tracked market cap: DOLO (Berachain) measures $13.98M and IBGT (Berachain) measures $567.09K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DOLO or IBGT?
On the contract checks we publish: DOLO (Berachain) grades A and IBGT (Berachain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DOLO and IBGT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show DOLO at −6.80% and IBGT at −14.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.