HostDIS vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
DIS (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
DIS vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| DIS | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0003687 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $361.77K | — |
| 24h volume | $5.23 | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $175.90K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $361.77K | — |
| Holders | 4,949 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~9,908× the liquidity of DIS
- RDK measures ~551,655,722× the 24h volume of DIS
- over the shared window DIS moved −8.07% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
DIS
DIS gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The mint key is burned, so the supply is capped and stays that way, and freeze has been renounced as well, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Both powers being renounced is the main reason DIS's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-16).
Looking at the market data, DIS shows a $175.90K pool and a holder base of 4,949 as of 2026-09-16. Encouragingly, that $175.90K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $361.77K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 4,949-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DIS or RDK?
By tracked market cap: DIS (Solana) measures $361.77K and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DIS or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: DIS (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DIS and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show DIS at −8.07% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
DIS vs RYYDIS vs FKBDIS vs CRDDIS vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.